left header image

Wednesday, June 02, 2010

Victorian Crochet

OK.  So normally I'd do a bunch of internet research to get my facts straight ... but this isn't normally, so I'm just going to say some stuff and hopefully it's true.  In Victorian Times, crochet was a big deal and everyone thought it was awesome (this is the part I might be making up).  

So I did a Google Book search the other day for books published between 1800 and 1910 that had the word crochet in them and found this crochet book published in 1847 (this is true, but God knows if it's actually Victorian ... OK, I caved and checked wikipedia, the Victorian Era started in 1837 and when until 1901 ... and there went an hour following links and learning stuff ... not *all* bad, I guess ... but now this post is a day later than I was hoping.  Anyway...)

I've been looking for something specific, and I think this crochet stitch pattern* fits the bill.  The problem is, the illustration isn't really a chart and the written directions make my head spin.  I didn't have the patience when I was looking at them to slow way down and see if I could Zen my way into understanding what they meant.  Instead, I went off-road.

The first couple of swatches below are me trying to follow the not-directions and the not-chart.  The next couple are me just plowing through hoping something worked.  Then I started half-heartedly charting as I went along.
Then, I got in the zone and BOOM, a chart and a repeatable pattern:  
Nice, isn't it?  Only one thing ... I wanted a pattern that got a little bigger as it went, like the illustration above.  Argh.  When I finished the last swatch, I was out of crochet time, so I'm going to have to come back to this (soon!?) because I think I can easily add some stuff in between the big holes to grow the row.  I'd also like to put the mesh row before the big hole back in.  I like the way that hole looks better than the hole right after the solid-ish row.

* AAAAAHHHHhhhhh!  So, if you're in google book search and you're looking at a book and you think, "Hey, I'd like to post this illustration as an image in my blog post." God help you if you don't see the "Clip" link, because that sucker will save you a *ton* of time.  A TON (unless, of course, you write a super-long footnote about it ... but *next time*, oh yes *next time*, it will save  you a ton of time.  (1) click "Clip" (2) Use your mouse cursor to draw a box of the thing you want to be your image (3) Notice the pop up box that has the url and embed code for the bit you wanted (4) copy and paste that text into your blog post. (5) Think to yourself, "Sure, Google is Evil, but whatevs.  Once in a blue moon they do something way cool."
19 Comments leave a comment


kingshearte said ...
Well done on getting that pattern deciphered. I've never actually tried a pattern of that vintage, but I've heard about how confusing they can be. So good on you for sticking with it until you made it work.

Also, thanks for that clipping tip. I haven't run up against this issue, but I know I wouldn't have known that trick if I had.
6/3/2010 8:28 AM

futuregirl replied ...
kingshearte ... I was so excited when I found the clip thing!!! I want to do more book searches just so I can use it again. :)
6/10/2010 5:13 PM

Stacey said ...
Try using a bigger hook with each round for the increasing size. Might help. :)
6/3/2010 10:16 AM

futuregirl replied ...
Stacey ... I've never done this is a pattern. Definitely something to try! Thanks for the suggestion. :)
6/10/2010 5:01 PM

Birdy said ...
That's really cool looking. If anyone can figure out how to make it work just right... it's you! Good luck.
6/3/2010 10:37 AM

futuregirl replied ...
Birdy ... Thanks for the vote of confidence! :)
6/10/2010 4:59 PM

Dar said ...
You persevered! This is very cool.
I was going to say bigger hook, too. I've done that with a shell stitch that I didn't want to alter to enlarge. But I see that there are more stitches in each consecutive motif repeat of the original. Of course, now I can't seem to uncross my eyes. Thanks for sharing this.
6/3/2010 12:28 PM

futuregirl replied ...
Dar ... It *is* a little eye-crossingly drawn. Thanks for stopping by and taking the time to comment. :)
6/23/2010 9:04 PM

Karen said ...
That is so gorgeous! And great job for figuring it out...I wouldn't have even known where to start.

I about died over the "following links for hours"...I can't tell you how many times I've been like "I wonder how many Presidents were obese by today's standards" and then I look at the clock, it's two in the morning, and I'm reading about the mating habits of quail.

That internet is a sly little devil...sucks ya right in.
6/3/2010 12:32 PM

futuregirl replied ...
Karen ... HA! As always, you brighten things up around here!
6/10/2010 5:05 PM

Barbara said ...
I can't believe you could do this do us...now I HAVE to look at this incredible book and maybe TRY some of those beautiful patterns..will I ever get out in the sunshine again? Seriously though, thanks for sharing the link!
6/3/2010 2:44 PM

futuregirl replied ...
Barbara ... Too bad you don't live here. We don't have much sunshine lately, so it's not so awful holing up at home with the hook and thread! :)
6/10/2010 5:09 PM

Jewelie said ...
I have a magazine that originally sold for something ridiculous like five cents, and it is chock-full of old Victorian patterns... one of my favorites being a filet-crochet boar hunt. Yes. As in giant pigs. Possibly being attacked with spears, but could be guns. It's so ridiculous and strange and not at all what you picture women stitching up in Victorian times.

It looks sort of like you could just change hook sizes to make the pattern larger.
6/4/2010 12:04 AM

futuregirl replied ...
Jewelie ... That boar hunt sounds awesome! It is funny thinking of those proper ladies whipping up a scene of pig carnage. :)
6/23/2010 9:02 PM

Kat said ...
part of the adventure is the unknown right? Great job!
6/4/2010 10:27 AM

futuregirl replied ...
Kat ... You are absolutely right! Thanks for visiting me!
6/23/2010 8:57 PM

marietta said ...
all crochet should be charted - just forget words, tooooooo complicated :)

i was looking at the original picture, and what i find interesting is that i would have started from the bottom and worked up . Where as you started at what looks like the top and worked your way down...funny brain
6/5/2010 12:06 AM

futuregirl replied ...
marietta .. Hi! Oh, I agree! Charts with little explanations if necessary ... but not huge blocks of text. Gah!
6/10/2010 5:11 PM
 
Kuky said ...
"In Victorian Times, crochet was a big deal and everyone thought it was awesome." Bwa ha ha!
6/12/2010 7:55 PM

YOUR FIRST COMMENT MUST BE MANUALLY APPROVED


Leave A Commentprivacy policy 

Name


Email won't be displayed publicly


Website must start with http://


remember my info for next time

Comment html tags not allowed


Robot FoilerEnter the text from the image into the box.
get new image