left header image

Monday, March 02, 2009

Vintage Japanese Craft Book - Post 2

One of the things I noticed in this magazine is that the projects feature many techniques that you never see used now (meaning the last 20 years).

The motifs in the tank top picture above are worked in the cream, and then the brown detailing is added on top of that.  I don't know if I've ever seen a granny square pattern where a round of stitches crosses the boundaries of more than the row below it.  Certainly I've never seen one where you're chaining and stitching all over the top of it.


Why?  Why aren't we doing this all over the place?  Think of the possibilities!

Another technique you almost never see is motifs that aren't kaladascopic*.  The sweater above is my *absolute* favorite project in this magazine.  I love everything about it.

You can see on the left that they give you all the altered patterns for the motifs to put around the collar and armholes.  I love the wide almost-cowl neck.  The back and arms are a lacy crochet pattern.  I imagine it in bright peacock colors.

I don't know if I'll actually attempt it, though.  I've noticed that there are outfits that adorable, tiny Asian girls can wear and look oh-so-cute, while everyone else in the world looks *ridiculous* in them.  I suspect this is one of those items. :)

View all of the posts about this vintage Japanese craft book (once they are all posted).  And, before you even ask, this publication is covered by copyright law, so I can't send you any of the patterns in it.

* This is not a word.  Is there a word for something that is symmetric top to bottom and left to right in the same way?  I googled myself to death trying to find out if there's a word for it.  There must be.  Blaize?

12 Comments leave a comment


AndreaLea said ...
That sweater would look great in peacock colors. I think it would be cute and wearable and not in the category of "only cute in tiny size".
3/2/2009 10:44 AM

sharon said ...
"Radial symmetry" might be the term you're after.
3/2/2009 2:32 PM

Jennifer Rose said ...
Seeing these pictures makes me want to try to learn to crochet again. Such pretty things to try to make :) Thank you for talking about the book
3/2/2009 6:21 PM

nancymoo said ...
So cool! I spent some time in Japan (my husband was there for 2 years) and I bought some crochet supplies there, but never any books. I was way too leery of thing in Japanese. What a shame - the Japanese books you have shown on here are amazing!!
3/2/2009 8:56 PM

nancymoo said ...
So cool! I spent some time in Japan (my husband was there for 2 years) and I bought some crochet supplies there, but never any books. I was way too leery of thing in Japanese. What a shame - the Japanese books you have shown on here are amazing!!
3/2/2009 8:59 PM

nancymoo said ...
whoa - sorry! I don't know what I did to get a double post!! :)
3/2/2009 8:59 PM

Blaize said ...
The blocks have both vertical and horizontal symmetry. Or x and y axes symmetry, if you like that better. Here's some names for shapes that are thus symmetrical: http://tinyurl.com/cchky4

Is that good enough to fulfill my evocation in the above post?
3/2/2009 11:28 PM

Blaize said ...
"Radial symmetry" is good, but doesn't work as the description for non-radial shapes, i.e. oblongs, &c.
3/2/2009 11:29 PM

vashti said ...
I wonder about terms within the "cycloids" or orbital family of shapes, for those motifs that are crocheted in the round (see some of these: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Images_of_curves ). The Peacocky Square has symmetry but the ways it doesn't are what interest you, right? Compared to the usual crocheted motif, I think one would say that it has limited axial and reflection symmetry but I don't know if there's a term for the symmetries that are "lacking". Futuregirl, are you looking for a way to name a category of motifs that get their distinctive look by not being constructed entirely in the round?
Love your site.
3/3/2009 1:38 PM

est said ...
this book really so swell! and the patterns really so vintage and look so complicated to me but i'm sure it would be tackleble by hardcore crocheter like you :)
3/4/2009 12:18 AM

bratelie said ...
Wow, I like so much this unknowledge techniques, I'll try to my Auntumn's jersey... I like both on! Hugs
5/31/2010 9:54 AM
 
futuregirl replied ...
bratelie ... Thanks for visiting!
6/23/2010 9:13 PM

YOUR FIRST COMMENT MUST BE MANUALLY APPROVED


Leave A Commentprivacy policy 

Name


Email won't be displayed publicly


Website must start with http://


remember my info for next time

Comment html tags not allowed


Robot FoilerEnter the text from the image into the box.
get new image